Re: Makeinfo version parsing broken?

[Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>]

On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 12:45:20PM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Aurelien Jarno<aurelien@aurel32.net> wrote:
> > The GFDL instead is not considered non-free, but the GFDL *with*
> > invariant sections is considered non-free.
> 
> Sorry, I don't follow, I assume you meant to write "free" somwhere
> instead of "non-free?"
> 

GFDL *without* invariant sections -> free
GFDL *with* invariant sections -> non-free

Cheers,
Aurelien

-- 
Aurelien Jarno	                        GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurelien@aurel32.net                 http://www.aurel32.net