[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

r3494 - in glibc-package/branches/eglibc-2.10/debian: . patches/powerpc



Author: aurel32
Date: 2009-05-11 21:53:15 +0000 (Mon, 11 May 2009)
New Revision: 3494

Modified:
   glibc-package/branches/eglibc-2.10/debian/changelog
   glibc-package/branches/eglibc-2.10/debian/patches/powerpc/local-sysconf.diff
Log:
    - Update patches/powerpc/local-sysconf.diff.



Modified: glibc-package/branches/eglibc-2.10/debian/changelog
===================================================================
--- glibc-package/branches/eglibc-2.10/debian/changelog	2009-05-11 14:34:24 UTC (rev 3493)
+++ glibc-package/branches/eglibc-2.10/debian/changelog	2009-05-11 21:53:15 UTC (rev 3494)
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
     - Update patches/hurd-i386/local-tls-support.diff.
     - Update patches/hurd-i386/submitted-extern_inline.diff.
     - Remove debian/patches/mips/cvs-context.diff (merged).
+    - Update debian/patches/powerpc/local-sysconf.diff.
     - Remove debian/patches/all/submitted-readme-version.diff (merged).
     - Remove debian/patches/any/submitted-install-map-files.diff (merged).
     - Remove debian/patches/any/cvs-pthread_h.diff (merged).

Modified: glibc-package/branches/eglibc-2.10/debian/patches/powerpc/local-sysconf.diff
===================================================================
--- glibc-package/branches/eglibc-2.10/debian/patches/powerpc/local-sysconf.diff	2009-05-11 14:34:24 UTC (rev 3493)
+++ glibc-package/branches/eglibc-2.10/debian/patches/powerpc/local-sysconf.diff	2009-05-11 21:53:15 UTC (rev 3494)
@@ -36,7 +36,8 @@
 +	 "cpu model".  We don't have to fear extremely long lines since	  \
 +	 the kernel will not generate them.  8192 bytes are really	  \
 +	 enough.  */							  \
-+      while (fgets_unlocked (BUFFER, sizeof (BUFFER), FP) != NULL)	  \
++      char *l;								  \
++      while ((l = next_line (FD, BUFFER, &CP, &RE, BUFFER_END)) != NULL)  \
 +	if (strncmp (BUFFER, "cpu\t\t:", 6) == 0)			  \
 +	  ++(RESULT);							  \
 +    }									  \


Reply to: