[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

YALG post - Yet Another linux-gate.so.1 post - What's the TRUTH?



after reading to nausea about linux-gate.so.1, it pains me greatly to
still need to post another question about it.

first off - please - nobody mention http://www.trilithium.com/johan/2005/08/linux-gate/
I would really appreciate that. Been there done that - didn't answer
my question or solve my problem.

I'm not sure 100% that I have a problem with linux-gate.so.1.
What I AM sure about, (I think ;-),  is that I have pointers to it,
and it DOES NOT EXIST.

Now - you're thinking, well, gee, sure it doesn't exist - that's why
there's 100's of posts about it.
Seriously - it doesn't even exist in memory!?!?!?

here's my [snipped] output from   $ ldd /usr/bin/scp
        linux-gate.so.1 =>  (0xffffe000)

it references a memory location; so according to a website I won't
mention; here's what cat /proc/self/maps looks like:
08048000-0804c000 r-xp 00000000 08:01 605108     /bin/cat
0804c000-0804d000 rwxp 00003000 08:01 605108     /bin/cat
0804d000-0806e000 rwxp 0804d000 00:00 0          [heap]
b7cc0000-b7de8000 r-xp 00000000 08:01 981960     /usr/lib/locale/
locale-archive
b7de8000-b7de9000 rwxp b7de8000 00:00 0
b7de9000-b7f10000 r-xp 00000000 08:01 539624     /lib/tls/i686/cmov/
libc-2.3.6.so
b7f10000-b7f15000 r-xp 00127000 08:01 539624     /lib/tls/i686/cmov/
libc-2.3.6.so
b7f15000-b7f17000 rwxp 0012c000 08:01 539624     /lib/tls/i686/cmov/
libc-2.3.6.so
b7f17000-b7f1a000 rwxp b7f17000 00:00 0
b7f1e000-b7f20000 rwxp b7f1e000 00:00 0
b7f20000-b7f21000 r-xp b7f20000 00:00 0          [vdso]
b7f21000-b7f36000 r-xp 00000000 08:01 523649     /lib/ld-2.3.6.so
b7f36000-b7f38000 rwxp 00014000 08:01 523649     /lib/ld-2.3.6.so
bfaee000-bfb03000 rw-p bfaee000 00:00 0          [stack]

So - as you can see - when I say I don't have a linux-gate.so.1 on my
system -
I don't even have the memory range that ldd SAYS l-g.s.1
references!!!!???

so - my question is simply this -
how do I fix my system, so that either l-g.s.1 IS properly referenced,
or removed from my system altogether ???

TIA - Bob


Reply to: