[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#493016: libc6: ldd doesn't work with ACLs



$ sh -x /usr/bin/ldd pdficon
+ TEXTDOMAIN=libc
+ TEXTDOMAINDIR=/usr/share/locale
+ RTLDLIST='/lib/ld-linux.so.2 /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2'
+ warn=
+ bind_now=
+ verbose=
+ filename_magic_regex='((^|/)lib|.so$)'
+ test 1 -gt 0
+ case "$1" in
+ break
+ add_env='LD_TRACE_LOADED_OBJECTS=1 LD_WARN= LD_BIND_NOW='
+ add_env='LD_TRACE_LOADED_OBJECTS=1 LD_WARN= LD_BIND_NOW= LD_LIBRARY_VERSION=$verify_out'
+ add_env='LD_TRACE_LOADED_OBJECTS=1 LD_WARN= LD_BIND_NOW= LD_LIBRARY_VERSION=$verify_out LD_VERBOSE='
+ test '' = yes
+ set -o pipefail
+ case $# in
+ single_file=t
+ result=0
+ for file in '"$@"'
+ test t = t
+ case $file in
+ file=./pdficon
+ test '!' -f ./pdficon
+ test -r ./pdficon
+ echo ldd: 'error: you do not have read permission for' '`./pdficon'\'''
ldd: error: you do not have read permission for `./pdficon'
+ result=1
+ exit 1

--
Thank You
Jefferson Cowart
Network and Systems Administrator
Libraries Information Technology 


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Aurelien Jarno [mailto:aurelien@aurel32.net]
> Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2008 04:09
> To: Jefferson Cowart; 493016@bugs.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Bug#493016: libc6: ldd doesn't work with ACLs
> 
> Jefferson Cowart a écrit :
> > Package: libc6
> > Version: 2.3.6.ds1-13etch7
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > ldd doesn't work properly with ACLs. As you can see below I have read
> access to the pdficon file. However ldd insists I
> > don't.
> >
> > jeff@vishnu:/srv/ccdl.libraries.claremont.edu/Content4.3/bin$ ldd
> pdficon
> > ldd: error: you do not have read permission for `./pdficon'
> 
> Could you please send us the output of 'sh -x /usr/bin/ldd pdficon' ?
> It
> should contain some debug details.
> 
> --
>   .''`.  Aurelien Jarno	            | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
>  : :' :  Debian developer           | Electrical Engineer
>  `. `'   aurel32@debian.org         | aurelien@aurel32.net
>    `-    people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net



Reply to: