Bug#416716: libc6: ldconfig does not write /etc/ld.so.cache~ synchronously

To: Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org>
Cc: 416716@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#416716: libc6: ldconfig does not write /etc/ld.so.cache~ synchronously
From: Russell Coker <russell@coker.com.au>
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 12:38:00 +1100
Message-id: <[🔎] 200703311138.03999.russell@coker.com.au>
Reply-to: russell@coker.com.au, 416716@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20070330220628.GB18935@.madism.org>
References: <[🔎] 20070329233134.26854.76449.reportbug@aeon.coker.com.au> <[🔎] 20070330220628.GB18935@.madism.org>

On Saturday 31 March 2007 08:06, Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org> wrote:
>   Given that it uses a temporary file, a fsync should be enough IMHO.
> O_SYNC looks like an overkill.

Sure.

Reply to:

References:
- Bug#416716: libc6: ldconfig does not write /etc/ld.so.cache~ synchronously
  - From: Russell Coker <russell@coker.com.au>
- Bug#416716: libc6: ldconfig does not write /etc/ld.so.cache~ synchronously
  - From: Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Bug#416716: libc6: ldconfig does not write /etc/ld.so.cache~ synchronously
Next by Date: Bug#412569: libc6: zdump -v segfaults
Previous by thread: Bug#416716: libc6: ldconfig does not write /etc/ld.so.cache~ synchronously
Next by thread: Bug#416928: libc6: off-by-one bug in strxfrm()
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread