On Thursday 08 February 2007 11:11, Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org> wrote: > err, why would that be a libc problem and not a mount one ? not that > I contest this could be true btw, but have you any hint that could > support this ? > > Note that I confirm I can reproduce it here too. AFAIK it could be either. If you think it's more likely to be mount then please re-assign it.