Bug#402776: still exists in 2.3.6.ds1-10

[dann frazier <dannf@dannf.org>]

On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 07:38:45PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Looking more closely to the manpage it seems there is actually no bug,
> the program behaves as expected:
> 
> "For each zonename on the command line, print the time at the lowest
> possible time value, the time one day after the lowest possible time
> value, the times both one second before..."
> 
> So that's normal that the output is different on architectures where
> time_t has a 64-bit type.
> 
> -9223372036854775808 and 9223372036854775807 are not really
> representable in our current gregorian calendar, so those date are
> displayed as "NULL".

makes sense.

-- 
dann frazier