Bug#453408: is this bug same as #155835?

[Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>]

unmerge 155835 453408
thanks

Yasushi SHOJI a écrit :
> First of all, thank you for aknowledge my bug report.
> 
> I've checked b.d.o and noticed that the bug report is merged to
> bug #155835.  so I've read the log and it seems that bug #155835 is
> about c99 and gnu extension conflict.
> 
> as I said in the previous message, I just want to use gnu extension
> version of %as, not c99. and it works if the given buffer is not
> empty.  but dies with empty string, like '""'.
> 
> so I thought that it is a bug in the gnu extension side.
> 
> I know you guys understand glibc much better than I do. so this not
> questioning what you guys are doing, but rather I'd like to have some
> explanation why #453408 and #155835 are merged, if possible. so if
> someone like me checked the log will understand why.
> 

Sorry I have read too quickly, I thought you were trying to use the c99
version which is actually behaving the same way as the gnu extension.

This is a different and real bug.

-- 
  .''`.  Aurelien Jarno	            | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
 : :' :  Debian developer           | Electrical Engineer
 `. `'   aurel32@debian.org         | aurelien@aurel32.net
   `-    people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net