Processed: Re: Bug#446503: [m68k] FTBFS: missing lowlevellock.h

To: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>
Cc: GNU Libc Maintainers <debian-glibc@lists.debian.org>(glibc #446503)
Subject: Processed: Re: Bug#446503: [m68k] FTBFS: missing lowlevellock.h
From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 17:12:08 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] handler.s.C.119229546515339.transcript@bugs.debian.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 4710FC01.60206@aurel32.net>
References: <[🔎] 4710FC01.60206@aurel32.net>

Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:

> retitle 446503 glibc: m68K architecture is not supported
Bug#446503: [m68k] FTBFS: missing lowlevellock.h
Changed Bug title to `glibc: m68K architecture is not supported' from `[m68k] FTBFS: missing lowlevellock.h'.

> tag 446503 + wontfix
Bug#446503: glibc: m68K architecture is not supported
There were no tags set.
Tags added: wontfix

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Reply to:

References:
- Bug#446503: [m68k] FTBFS: missing lowlevellock.h
  - From: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>

Prev by Date: Bug#314934: locale: document options like charmap
Next by Date: Bug#446503: [m68k] FTBFS: missing lowlevellock.h
Previous by thread: Bug#446503: [m68k] FTBFS: missing lowlevellock.h
Next by thread: Bug#314934: locale: document options like charmap
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread