Re: getaddrinfo: DNS round robin vs RFC3484 s6 rule 9, for etch
- To: Ian Jackson <ian@davenant.greenend.org.uk>, glibc@packages.debian.org, ftpmaster@debian.org, debian-release@lists.debian.org, debian-ctte@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: getaddrinfo: DNS round robin vs RFC3484 s6 rule 9, for etch
- From: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>
- Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 21:24:44 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20070928192444.GT25712@mails.so.argh.org>
- Mail-followup-to: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>, Ian Jackson <ian@davenant.greenend.org.uk>, glibc@packages.debian.org, ftpmaster@debian.org, debian-release@lists.debian.org, debian-ctte@lists.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20070928182250.GA27982@artemis.corp>
- References: <18173.9263.180829.524894@davenant.relativity.greenend.org.uk> <20070928171245.GC21309@artemis.corp> <[🔎] 18173.14391.208699.751436@davenant.relativity.greenend.org.uk> <[🔎] 20070928182250.GA27982@artemis.corp>
* Pierre Habouzit (madcoder@debian.org) [070928 21:08]:
> DNS RR is "broken" on Windows XP since SP2, Windows Vista, most *BSDs,
> Redhat and Fedora, and probably any Linux distribution out there
I was told it isn't broken on Fedora.
> I'm sorry, but the CT is a _Debian_ committee, composed of delegates,
> and how it works is a matter to the whole project.
Just being pedantic: The tech ctte isn't delegated, but a constitutional
body of its own. (This of course doesn't void that how the tech ctte
works is relevant for the project.)
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
Reply to: