[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#155835: status?

Version: 2.6-4

On Sat, Jul 28, 2007 at 07:18:08PM +0300, Touko Korpela wrote:
> Should this old glibc bug reassigned to gcc or closed?

Neither.  It should be fixed.

I just re-ran the test case found in the bug logs.  I wonder why you
didn't try it.

The test case still indicates that the bug exists.  Therefore the report
should not be closed.

It seems to me that this bug is a libc bug, not a gcc bug.  Therefore,
it looks to me it should *not* be reassigned.

In the bug logs, I suggested that gcc should communicate to libc that
--std=c99 was selected.  That is, however, a separate issue and if you
want, you could clone this report and reassign the clone.  That bug
might even be marked as blocking the fix of this bug; however, this bug
resides in the libc and, as far as I can tell, has not been fixed.

Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho, Jyväskylä

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: