Version: 2.6-4 On Sat, Jul 28, 2007 at 07:18:08PM +0300, Touko Korpela wrote: > Should this old glibc bug reassigned to gcc or closed? Neither. It should be fixed. I just re-ran the test case found in the bug logs. I wonder why you didn't try it. The test case still indicates that the bug exists. Therefore the report should not be closed. It seems to me that this bug is a libc bug, not a gcc bug. Therefore, it looks to me it should *not* be reassigned. In the bug logs, I suggested that gcc should communicate to libc that --std=c99 was selected. That is, however, a separate issue and if you want, you could clone this report and reassign the clone. That bug might even be marked as blocking the fix of this bug; however, this bug resides in the libc and, as far as I can tell, has not been fixed. -- Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho, Jyväskylä http://antti-juhani.kaijanaho.fi/newblog/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/antti-juhani/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature