Bug#425905: marked as done (nscd: should it depend on libc6-amd64 ?)
Your message dated Wed, 30 May 2007 15:12:54 +0200
with message-id <465D7856.1080103@aurel32.net>
and subject line Bug#425905: nscd: should it depend on libc6-amd64 ?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: nscd
Version: 2.5-8
Severity: normal
Hi,
I have K7 CPU. Lots of other my hosts have i686.
Why upgrade to nscd 2.5-8 should bring libc6-amd64 with itself ?
Are there really any benefits from this, even on x86_64 CPUs ?
What is so performance-critical in nscd that wins from
64bit-optimized code ?
Thank you in advance for your reactions.
Hope to see this dependency removed or downgraded to
suggests/recommends soon.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-4-k7 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=uk_UA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=uk_UA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages nscd depends on:
ii libc6-amd64 2.5-8 GNU C Library: 64bit Shared librar
nscd recommends no packages.
-- debconf-show failed
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Wladimir Mutel a écrit :
> Package: nscd
> Version: 2.5-8
> Severity: normal
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I have K7 CPU. Lots of other my hosts have i686.
> Why upgrade to nscd 2.5-8 should bring libc6-amd64 with itself ?
> Are there really any benefits from this, even on x86_64 CPUs ?
> What is so performance-critical in nscd that wins from
> 64bit-optimized code ?
>
> Thank you in advance for your reactions.
> Hope to see this dependency removed or downgraded to
> suggests/recommends soon.
>
I have just fixed this bug by doing a binNMU on i386. The version
2.5-9+b1 should be fine.
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer
`. `' aurel32@debian.org | aurelien@aurel32.net
`- people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net
--- End Message ---
Reply to: