[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

r2118 - in glibc-package/trunk/debian: . debhelper.in



Author: aurel32
Date: 2007-04-23 22:28:25 +0000 (Mon, 23 Apr 2007)
New Revision: 2118

Added:
   glibc-package/trunk/debian/debhelper.in/libc.NEWS
Modified:
   glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog
Log:
  * debian/debhelper.in/libc.NEWS: new file to warn user to upgrade
    to a 2.6.1 or later kernel before upgrading the glibc.



Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog
===================================================================
--- glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog	2007-04-23 13:32:39 UTC (rev 2117)
+++ glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog	2007-04-23 22:28:25 UTC (rev 2118)
@@ -1,10 +1,12 @@
 glibc (2.5-5) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
 
-  * Rename patches/all/submitted-iconv-E13B.diff into 
-    patches/all/cvs-iconv-E13B.diff as the patch has been accepted 
+  * Rename patches/all/submitted-iconv-E13B.diff into
+    patches/all/cvs-iconv-E13B.diff as the patch has been accepted
     upstream.
+  * debian/debhelper.in/libc.NEWS: new file to warn user to upgrade
+    to a 2.6.1 or later kernel before upgrading the glibc.
 
- -- Aurelien Jarno <aurel32@debian.org>  Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:31:48 +0200
+ -- Aurelien Jarno <aurel32@debian.org>  Tue, 24 Apr 2007 00:27:54 +0200
 
 glibc (2.5-4) unstable; urgency=low
 

Added: glibc-package/trunk/debian/debhelper.in/libc.NEWS
===================================================================
--- glibc-package/trunk/debian/debhelper.in/libc.NEWS	2007-04-23 13:32:39 UTC (rev 2117)
+++ glibc-package/trunk/debian/debhelper.in/libc.NEWS	2007-04-23 22:28:25 UTC (rev 2118)
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+glibc (2.5-1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ Starting with version 2.5-1, the glibc requires a 2.6.1 or later 
+ kernel.  If you use a 2.4 kernel, please upgrade it *before*
+ installing glibc.
+
+ Note: This does not apply to the m68k architecture and to non-Linux
+       kernels.
+
+ -- Aurelien Jarno <aurel32@debian.org>  Tue, 24 Apr 2007 00:26:48 +0200



Reply to: