Your message dated Tue, 17 Apr 2007 00:56:03 +0200 with message-id <20070416225603.GA23484@artemis> and subject line Bug#256770: libc6.1-dev: multiple definitions in libc.a (lc-ctype.o), breaks Intel compiler has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: libc6.1-dev: multiple definitions in libc.a (lc-ctype.o), breaks Intel compiler
- From: Duraid Madina <duraid@octopus.com.au>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 09:47:24 +1000
- Message-id: <E1Bf5qO-0008Ei-00@localhost>
Package: libc6.1-dev Version: 2.3.2.ds1-13.0.1 Severity: normal Tags: experimental Hi there, libc.a has objects with have multiply defined symbols. Is this the intention? I hope not, because it breaks the Intel C compiler's interprocedural optimization. Write a simple C program, try to build it with 'icc -ipo <test.c>' and you will see messages like: libc.a(read.o) : multiple definition of '__syscall_error_3' libc.a(open.o): first defined here libc.a(llseek.o) : multiple definition of '__syscall_error_3' libc.a(open.o): first defined here libc.a(write.o) : multiple definition of '__syscall_error_3' libc.a(open.o): first defined here libc.a(lc-ctype.o) : multiple definition of '_nl_postload_ctype' libc.a(lc-ctype.o): first defined here libc.a(lc-ctype.o) : multiple definition of '_nl_current_LC_CTYPE' libc.a(lc-ctype.o): first defined here libc.a(lc-ctype.o) : multiple definition of '_nl_postload_ctype' libc.a(lc-ctype.o): first defined here ... This looks bad. Not sure exactly when the regression occurred, but it hasn't been _that_ long (less than two or three months, I think). -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: ia64 Kernel: Linux 2.6.5-rc2 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages libc6.1-dev depends on: ii libc6.1 2.3.2.ds1-13.0.1 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii linux-kernel-headers 2.5.999-test7-bk-16 Linux Kernel Headers for developme -- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 256770-done@bugs.debian.org
- Cc: 256770-submitter@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#256770: libc6.1-dev: multiple definitions in libc.a (lc-ctype.o), breaks Intel compiler
- From: Pierre HABOUZIT <madcoder@debian.org>
- Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 00:56:03 +0200
- Message-id: <20070416225603.GA23484@artemis>
- In-reply-to: <1135685178.3241.52.camel@mebius.reciva.com>
- References: <1135685178.3241.52.camel@mebius.reciva.com>
Version: 2.5 On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 12:06:18PM +0000, Phil Blundell wrote: > Please test with glibc 2.3.5 (now in unstable) and let us know if this > bug is still happening. No news from submitter, icc not in debian to test either. Closing. Please reopen if the problem persists. -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O madcoder@debian.org OOO http://www.madism.orgAttachment: pgpBvh6PhS5du.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---