[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#310445: marked as done (libc6: static binary fails with assertion "bad dynamic tag")

Your message dated Sun, 15 Apr 2007 13:08:42 +0200
with message-id <20070415110842.GA3649@artemis>
and subject line Bug#310445: More information needed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.5-1
Severity: important
Tags: experimental


I have a static binary that runs well on sarge and sid systems.  On this system
with libc6 from experimental, it fails:

$ ./multivideo.static

Gdk-WARNING **: locale not supported by C library
multivideo.static: dynamic-link.h:62: elf_get_dynamic_info: Assertion `! "bad dynamic tag"' failed.

I will send the binary to the BTS as soon as I get the bug number.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-1-686
Locale: LANG=fr_FR@euro, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR@euro (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages libc6 depends on:
ii  libdb1-compat                 2.1.3-7    The Berkeley database routines [gl

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
  * no news from submitter
  * static linking against libc is frowned upon, and mostly unsupported

On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 01:32:14PM +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> tag 310445 moreinfo
> severity 310445 normal
> thanks
> There are new versions of glibc available. Could you perhaps recheck
> whether this bug is reproducible? Furthermore the source for that binary
> would be helpful if available.
> Helmut Grohne

·O·  Pierre Habouzit
··O                                                madcoder@debian.org
OOO                                                http://www.madism.org

Attachment: pgpOFGtu4WlKs.pgp
Description: PGP signature

--- End Message ---

Reply to: