Bug#325600: closed by Aurelien Jarno (Closing bugs fixed in unreleased version 2.4-1 of the glibc)
That could be the case. When I tried to add the patch to the source package,
it told me that all hunks failed because it was already applied. Now I
changed the "series" file in debian/patches to revert the patch and build
the package again...
-----
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Evans [mailto:tom@23palmer.net]
> Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 5:41 PM
> To: John Morrissey
> Cc: Aurelien Jarno; 325600@bugs.debian.org; Pierre Habouzit; Uwe Schindler
> Subject: Re: Bug#325600: closed by Aurelien Jarno (Closing bugs fixed in
> unreleased version 2.4-1 of the glibc)
>
>
> It might be - maybe that change is what broke it?
>
> I'll know later today / this weekend.
>
> ...tom
>
> On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 11:32:57 -0400, John Morrissey <jwm@horde.net> wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 11:45:13AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> >> Could you please try this patch instead:
> >>
> > http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-
> bin/cvsweb.cgi/libc/sysdeps/unix/alpha/sysdep.h.diff?r1=1.26&r2=1.26.2.1&c
> vsroot=glibc
> >>
> >> It looks a lot better, and it's always easier to convince the release
> >> managers to accept a patch if it has been accepted upstream first.
> >
> > Call me crazy, but it seems that this change is already in the upstream
> > glibc tarball (glibc-2.3.6.ds1.tar.bz2) included with the 2.3.6.ds1-13
> > packaging for etch?
> >
> > john
> > --
> > John Morrissey _o /\ ---- __o
> > jwm@horde.net _-< \_ / \ -
Reply to: