[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#325600: closed by Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net> (Closing bugs fixed in unreleased version 2.4-1 of the glibc)

On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 10:26:09AM +0200, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> > Tom Evans a écrit :
> > > When will this version be moved into stable/Etch?
> > 
> > This version (or a later one) will move to stable for Lenny, but will
> > never move to Etch, as it is now a released version.
> Somewhere in the past there was a very simple patch (look for "not_cancel")
> that worked for the 2.3 release of the glibc (Tom wrote that):
> "If I simply change (in linuxthreads/sysdep/unix/sysv/linux/not-cancel.h) 
> from:
> # define waitpid_not_cancel(pid, stat_loc, options) \
>   INLINE_SYSCALL (osf_wait4, 4, pid, stat_loc, options, NULL)
> to:
> # define waitpid_not_cancel(pid, stat_loc, options) \
>   wait4( pid, stat_loc, options, NULL )
> all is well - I understand the performance benefits of the inlining,
> but since x86 is NPTL anyway, perhaps this is an okay solution?
> I'm guessing that there is an Alpha-related optimizer bug perhaps?
> Or that the inline_syscall4 in sysdep/unix/alpha/sysdep.h is somehow
> broken?"

> Why was this patch never included for stable?
  Because we weren't aware it existed ? Because no alpha machine is
available to developers for a year now ?

  You know we're not semi gods with an echelon trigger on any glibc
patch that floats in the intarweb.

  But if the patch is _indeed_ that simple, I truly believe we could
make it into etch-r1.

·O·  Pierre Habouzit
··O                                                madcoder@debian.org
OOO                                                http://www.madism.org

Attachment: pgppokyuHccMo.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: