[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#394089: marked as done (ldconfig - i686 instructions)



Your message dated Sat, 4 Nov 2006 15:54:25 +0100
with message-id <20061104145424.GA17792@bode.aurel32.net>
and subject line ldconfig - i686 instructions
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: libc6
Severity: grave Version: 2.5-0exp2
Tags: experimental


Hi,

libc6/ldconfig is broken on plain i486 and i586 platforms. It is due to

 * sysdeps/i386.mk: ship the Xen flavour of ldconfig in libc6.
   It should be a few percent slower on plain i386, but a lot faster on Xen i386.

As a result of "xen_configure_target=i686-linux",
ldconfig needs cmov capable processor :-(

Petr



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.5-0exp3

On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 10:45:51AM +0200, Petr Salinger wrote:
> Package: libc6
> Severity: grave 
> Version: 2.5-0exp2
> Tags: experimental
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> libc6/ldconfig is broken on plain i486 and i586 platforms. 
> It is due to
> 
>  * sysdeps/i386.mk: ship the Xen flavour of ldconfig in libc6.
>    It should be a few percent slower on plain i386, but a lot faster on Xen 
>    i386.
> 
> As a result of "xen_configure_target=i686-linux",
> ldconfig needs cmov capable processor :-(
> 

This bug has been fixed in version 2.5-0exp3. Closing it.

-- 
  .''`.  Aurelien Jarno	            | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
 : :' :  Debian developer           | Electrical Engineer
 `. `'   aurel32@debian.org         | aurelien@aurel32.net
   `-    people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net

--- End Message ---

Reply to: