[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#383976: unable to upgrade package libc6



Dnia 21-08-2006, pon o godzinie 17:06 +0200, Aurelien Jarno napisał(a):
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 10:15:10AM +0200, Tomasz Cichecki wrote:
> > Package: libc6
> > Version: 2.3.6-19
> > Severity: grave
> > Justification: renders package unusable
> >
> > I cannot upgrade from libc6_2.3.6-19 to libc6_2.3.6.ds1-2
> > Below screen dump:
> > knight@workingrock:/usr/share/doc/libc6$ export LC_ALL=C
> > knight@workingrock:/usr/share/doc/libc6$ sudo apt-get install libc6
> > Reading package lists... Done
> > Building dependency tree... Done
> > Suggested packages:
> >   glibc-doc
> >   The following packages will be upgraded:
> >     libc6
> >     1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 93 not upgraded.
> >     1 not fully installed or removed.
> >     Need to get 0B/4696kB of archives.
> >     After unpacking 0B of additional disk space will be used.
> >     (Reading database ... 175620 files and directories currently
> >     installed.)
> >     Preparing to replace libc6 2.3.6-19 (using
> >     .../libc6_2.3.6.ds1-2_i386.deb) ...
> >     Unpacking replacement libc6 ...
> >     dpkg: error processing
> >     /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.3.6.ds1-2_i386.deb (--unpack):
> >      dpkg: warning - old post-removal script killed by signal
> >      (Segmentation fault)
> >
> >    dpkg: error while cleaning up:
> >     subprocess pre-installation script killed by signal (Segmentation
> >     fault)
> >    Errors were encountered while processing:
> >      /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.3.6.ds1-2_i386.deb
> >    E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
>
> I am unable to reproduce this problem on my machine, so we will have to
> debug it on our system.
>

> First of all, is your system ok? Random segfaults could come for a
> kernel that started to oops. You can have a look to the output of
> "dmesg".
No, dmesg is clean like a pearl. Below screen dump:
(...)
> Finally it would be nice if you acn send me the output of "ldd
> /bin/bash", so that we can see which version of the libc are you using
> (linuxthreads, nptl, nptl i686 or xen).
>
Wow!!!Forget the dmesg! Can you guess what the problem was!?!??
Some time ago I installed a wrapper lib for alsa to run oss apps on alsa
instead of using the kernel compat layer.
I guess the alsa-oss package need to be recompiled against the new libc6
I had that libalsatoss.so.0 library preloaded:
knight@workingrock:~$ cat /etc/ld.so.preload
/usr/lib/libaoss.so

After commenting it out and running ldconfig the problem disappeared.
Below output from ldd /bin/bash from before and after the action:

Before:
knight@workingrock:~$ ldd /bin/bash
        /usr/lib/libaoss.so (0xa7f18000)
        linux-gate.so.1 =>  (0xffffe000)
        libncurses.so.5 => /lib/libncurses.so.5 (0xa7ebe000)
        libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0xa7eba000)
        libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0xa7d9f000)
        libalsatoss.so.0 => /usr/lib/libalsatoss.so.0 (0xa7d96000)
        /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xa7f1f000)
        libasound.so.2 => /usr/lib/libasound.so.2 (0xa7cd4000)
        libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0xa7cb0000)
        libpthread.so.0 => /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0xa7c5d000)

After:
knight@workingrock:~$ ldd /bin/bash
        linux-gate.so.1 =>  (0xffffe000)
        libncurses.so.5 => /lib/libncurses.so.5 (0xa7eb1000)
        libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0xa7eac000)
        libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0xa7d91000)
        /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xa7f0b000)
knight@workingrock:~$ sudo dpkg -i Desktop/libc6_2.3.6.ds1-2_i386.deb
(Reading database ... 175620 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace libc6 2.3.6-19
(using .../libc6_2.3.6.ds1-2_i386.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement libc6 ...
Setting up libc6 (2.3.6.ds1-2) ...

:)

Thanx very much for helping me to debug the problem. Knowing the above
you can look into it more approperly and perhaps fill-in another bug
against libaoss

Greetings





Reply to: