Bug#227386: libc6-dev: ENOTSUP==EOPNOTSUPP, which violates SUSv3

To: "Brian M. Carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.ath.cx>, 227386@bugs.debian.org, control@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#227386: libc6-dev: ENOTSUP==EOPNOTSUPP, which violates SUSv3
From: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 16:25:10 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 43FB30D6.3080409@aurel32.net>
Reply-to: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>, 227386@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1140337535.9540.42.camel@localhost>
References: <[🔎] 1140337535.9540.42.camel@localhost>

severity 227386 wishlist
thanks

I have found no place where either the Linux kernel, the GNU libc orDebian claim full POSIX compliance. Therefore this a wishlist.


If you found such a place, I will upgrade the bug back to minor.

--
  .''`.  Aurelien Jarno	            | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
 : :' :  Debian developer           | Electrical Engineer
 `. `'   aurel32@debian.org         | aurelien@aurel32.net
   `-    people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Processed: Re: Bug#227386: libc6-dev: ENOTSUP==EOPNOTSUPP, which violates SUSv3
  - From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
- Bug#227386: libc6-dev: ENOTSUP==EOPNOTSUPP, which violates SUSv3
  - From: "Brian M. Carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.ath.cx>

References:
- Bug#227386: libc6-dev: ENOTSUP==EOPNOTSUPP, which violates SUSv3
  - From: "Brian M. Carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.ath.cx>

Prev by Date: Processed: rename ro_RO locales patch
Next by Date: Bug#227386: libc6-dev: ENOTSUP==EOPNOTSUPP, which violates SUSv3
Previous by thread: Bug#227386: libc6-dev: ENOTSUP==EOPNOTSUPP, which violates SUSv3
Next by thread: Processed: Re: Bug#227386: libc6-dev: ENOTSUP==EOPNOTSUPP, which violates SUSv3
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread