r1189 - in glibc-package/trunk/debian: . patches
Author: aurel32
Date: 2006-02-18 23:46:15 +0000 (Sat, 18 Feb 2006)
New Revision: 1189
Modified:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog
glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/glibc-manual-memory.diff
Log:
* Fix the prototype of sbrk() in the manual. (Closes: #281863)
Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog
===================================================================
--- glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog 2006-02-18 23:24:22 UTC (rev 1188)
+++ glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog 2006-02-18 23:46:15 UTC (rev 1189)
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
bug#333565).
* Add hurd-ioctl-decode-argument.diff (fixes decoding of ioctl
arguments) from Samuel Thibault. (Closes: #320273)
+ * Fix the prototype of sbrk() in the manual. (Closes: #281863)
-- Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org> Sun, 12 Feb 2006 11:04:38 -0500
Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/glibc-manual-memory.diff
===================================================================
--- glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/glibc-manual-memory.diff 2006-02-18 23:24:22 UTC (rev 1188)
+++ glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/glibc-manual-memory.diff 2006-02-18 23:46:15 UTC (rev 1189)
@@ -1,3 +1,24 @@
+2005-01-14 GOTO Masanori <gotom@debian.or.jp>
+
+ * manual/memory.texi (sbrk): Fix definition.
+
+===================================================================
+RCS file: /cvs/glibc/libc/manual/memory.texi,v
+retrieving revision 1.78
+retrieving revision 1.79
+diff -u -r1.78 -r1.79
+--- libc/manual/memory.texi 2004/10/18 00:53:12 1.78
++++ libc/manual/memory.texi 2005/01/26 02:39:11 1.79
+@@ -2384,7 +2384,7 @@
+
+ @comment unistd.h
+ @comment BSD
+-@deftypefun int sbrk (ptrdiff_t @var{delta})
++@deftypefun void *sbrk (ptrdiff_t @var{delta})
+ This function is the same as @code{brk} except that you specify the new
+ end of the data segment as an offset @var{delta} from the current end
+ and on success the return value is the address of the resulting end of
+
2005-08-29 Thomas Schwinge <schwinge@nic-nac-project.de>
[BZ #1261]
Reply to: