Re: 2.3.6

[Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org>]

On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 11:43:01PM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 09:03:29AM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 29, 2006 at 06:59:14PM -0500, Clint Adams wrote:
> > > Someone needs to evaluate and dispose of the following patches
> > > which do not apply to glibc 2.3.6.
> > > 
> > > glibc235-gcc4-arm-inline.diff
> > > hurd-libpthread-indirect-loading.diff
> > > glibc235-gcc4-s390-inline.diff
> > > glibc235-gcc4-hurd.diff
> > > mips-bits-syscall.diff
> > > localedata/locale-ku_TR.diff
> > > localedata/tailor-iso14651_t1.diff
> > > localedata/fix-unknown-symbols.diff
> > > localedata/first_weekday.diff
> > 
> > I can take care of localedata patches.  Just disable them in SVN when
> > switching to 2.3.6 and I will fix them.  Is there some timeline for
> > this switch?
> 
> They are fixed now, the problem was that new files added into CVS had
> been omitted in cvs-localedata.diff

Did you break 2.3.5 in the process?

Applying patch localedata/cvs-localedata.diff
patching file localedata/ChangeLog
Hunk #1 FAILED at 1.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 280.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 252 with fuzz 2 (offset -40 lines).
2 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- rejects in file localedata/ChangeLog
patching file localedata/Makefile
patching file localedata/SUPPORTED
Hunk #1 succeeded at 46 (offset -3 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 78 (offset -5 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 194 (offset -6 lines).
Hunk #4 FAILED at 217.
Hunk #5 FAILED at 233.
Hunk #6 FAILED at 257.
Hunk #7 succeeded at 272 (offset -12 lines).
Hunk #8 FAILED at 291.
Hunk #9 succeeded at 303 with fuzz 2 (offset -19 lines).
4 out of 9 hunks FAILED -- rejects in file localedata/SUPPORTED

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery