--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: Segfault when setting up glibc-doc
- From: Josep Lladonosa i Capell <jep@veinat.net>
- Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 17:37:33 +0100
- Message-id: <200403201637.i2KGbXXc017900@verd.casa>
Package: glibc-doc
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-11
Severity: normal
I've upgraded a stable system to unstable. glibc-doc gave a segfault
when setting up:
*********
intralin3:/etc/apt# apt-get install glibc-doc
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
glibc-doc is already the newest version.
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 139 not upgraded.
1 not fully installed or removed.
Need to get 0B of archives.
After unpacking 0B of additional disk space will be used.
Setting up glibc-doc (2.3.2.ds1-11) ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/glibc-doc.postinst: line 19: 7661 Segmentation fault
in
stall-info --quiet --section "GNU C library functions" "GNU C library
functions"
/usr/share/info/libc-dir-add.info
********
The problem: dpkg version. Stable version was 1.9.21.
I've upgraded 'manually' to latest dpkg (1.10.20), and glibc-doc could be
set up...
Perhaps a dependency has to be added...
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux verd 2.4.23-fs #3 dl des 15 01:55:35 CET 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=ca_ES@euro, LC_CTYPE=ca_ES@euro (ignored: LC_ALL set to ca_ES.UTF-8)
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: GOTO Masanori <gotom@debian.or.jp>
- Cc: Lionel Elie Mamane <lionel@mamane.lu>, 221215-done@bugs.debian.org, 239061-done@bugs.debian.org, Josep Lladonosa i Capell <jep@veinat.net>
- Subject: Re: Bug#221215: Bug#239061: Segfault when setting up glibc-doc
- From: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>
- Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 10:05:46 +0200
- Message-id: <20060522080546.GA13934@henry.aurel32.net>
- In-reply-to: <81fz8ck1os.wl@omega.webmasters.gr.jp>
- References: <200403201637.i2KGbXXc017900@verd.casa> <81659aljtp.wl@omega.webmasters.gr.jp> <20040629131823.GA19501@tofu.mamane.lu> <814qoukwzm.wl@omega.webmasters.gr.jp> <20040630154700.GB1673@tofu.mamane.lu> <81fz8ck1os.wl@omega.webmasters.gr.jp>
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 09:31:47AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> At Wed, 30 Jun 2004 17:47:00 +0200,
> Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> > >>> (3) This problem is occured when your dpkg is old (woody) and you
> > >>> want to install sarge's glibc-doc. I wonder we need to support
> > >>> such situation.
> >
> > >> I think we should. People mixing stable and testing/unstable, or more
> > >> simply doing stage-wise upgrades is relatively common. We should give
> > >> them the hint that dpkg should be upgraded first.
> >
> > > Did you confirm this bug?
> >
> > I encountered it with glibc-doc, upgraded dpkg to fix it and continued
> > my upgrade. So, I didn't see if it hits other packages.
>
> There're two bug reports separately, so I guess dpkg + glibc-doc made
> breakage in the past.
>
> > > At least the current upgrade does not induce this problem, I think
> > > we don't need depends or conflicts.
> >
> > If the woody -> sarge transition is OK, then the need for it is
> > greatly reduced.
>
> I believe so.
>
> I wonder why dpkg broke glibc-doc installation at that time. If no
> one object, I'll close this bug instead of adding depends/conflicts.
>
> Please report if you have trouble with another woody->sarge upgrade.
>
Nobody has objected in almost 2 years, so cllosing the bug now.
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux developer | Electrical Engineer
`. `' aurel32@debian.org | aurelien@aurel32.net
`- people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net
--- End Message ---