[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#283860: marked as done (fet: ftbfs [sparc] ldd: /lib/ld-linux.so.2 exited with unknown exit code (132))



Your message dated Mon, 10 Apr 2006 07:31:57 +0200
with message-id <20060410053157.GA22068@bode.aurel32.net>
and subject line Bug#283860: fet: ftbfs [sparc] ldd: /lib/ld-linux.so.2 exited with unknown exit code (132)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: fet
Version: 3.9.19-1
Severity: normal

fet fails to build on sparc.  Duplicated with pbuilder.  Not
release-critical since it never has.


dh_shlibdeps
ldd: /lib/ld-linux.so.2 exited with unknown exit code (132)
dpkg-shlibdeps: failure: ldd on `debian/fet/usr/bin/fet' gave error exit status 1
dh_shlibdeps: command returned error code 256

full build log:
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=fet&ver=3.9.19-1&arch=sparc&stamp=1101448389&file=log&as=raw

-- 
Blars Blarson			blarson@blars.org
				http://www.blars.org/blars.html
With Microsoft, failure is not an option.  It is a standard feature.


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,

Since the bug has been reported, this package has been built a lot of
time on the build daemons without problem. I am also unable to reproduce
it. I am therefore closing the bug, please feel free to reopen it if
needed.

Bye,
Aurelien


-- 
  .''`.  Aurelien Jarno	            | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
 : :' :  Debian developer           | Electrical Engineer
 `. `'   aurel32@debian.org         | aurelien@aurel32.net
   `-    people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net

--- End Message ---

Reply to: