Re: glibc 2.3.5-12.1 screwed up on Alpha
On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 11:13:15AM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote:
>
> In fact this is a timestamp problem, debian/control has not been generated
> on Alpha because it appears after its dependant targets in
> glibc_2.3.5-12.1.diff.gz.
> I am afraid that a new upload is needed to fix this mess. Adding a
> timestamp file in stamp-dir/ looks like a very good idea so that this problem
> does not occur again.
> Glibc 2.3.5-12 is in /glibc-package/tags/2.3.5-12/ so it is easy to include
> 12.1 NMU and this fix in SVN. What is the recommended way? Copy this tag
> into branches/some-descriptive-name? I will work on this tonight when back
> at home, unless someone fixes it in the meantime (or tells that I am wrong ;)).
Either do that, or just do the NMU straight (without touching SVN). Up
to you.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
Reply to: