Bug#213503: [rmh@aybabtu.com: Re: knetbsd maintained? want glibc patched for it?]
Just for reference, below is the status of knetbsd.
Drew Daniels
----- Forwarded message from Robert Millan <rmh@aybabtu.com> -----
Envelope-to: ddaniels@localhost
Delivery-date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 23:17:56 -0600
X-BrightmailFiltered: true
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
X-IronPort-AV: i="3.97,328,1125896400";
d="scan'208"; a="99097087:sNHT36036224"
From: Robert Millan <rmh@aybabtu.com>
To: Drew Scott Daniels <ddaniels@UMalumni.mb.ca>,
debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
Cc: Glibc/k*BSD <glibc-bsd-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Subject: Re: knetbsd maintained? want glibc patched for it?
Organisation: free as in freedom
X-DCC-UofM-Metrics: electra 1032; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on Zimmer
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=10.0 tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO
autolearn=ham version=3.0.3
On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 02:55:04PM -0600, Drew Scott Daniels wrote:
> Hi,
> Is Debian knetbsd maintained? I know it's nowhere near where Debian
> kfreebsd is. I ran across the following in bug 213503 that may be of
> interest to those interested in Debian knetbsd. I haven't checked at all
> to see if glibc has been patched for knetbsd, but if it has, then the
> bug could use an update.
No, it's not currently maintained. However, since it's also based on Glibc I
believe it can be reinstated with minimal effort. Most of the work that has
been done on Debian GNU/kFreeBSD can be re-used.
--
Robert Millan
----- End forwarded message -----
Reply to: