Bug#333766: libc6: SIGBUS in libm on hppa breaks qt-x11-free
- To: Joel Soete <joel.soete@tiscali.be>
- Cc: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>, 333766@bugs.debian.org, Grant Grundler <grundler@parisc-linux.org>, Randolph Chung <randolph@tausq.org>, Stephen Gran <sgran@debian.org>, Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>, debian-hppa@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Bug#333766: libc6: SIGBUS in libm on hppa breaks qt-x11-free
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org>
- Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 18:31:20 -0400
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20051014223120.GA7665@nevyn.them.org>
- Mail-followup-to: Joel Soete <joel.soete@tiscali.be>, Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>, 333766@bugs.debian.org, Grant Grundler <grundler@parisc-linux.org>, Randolph Chung <randolph@tausq.org>, Stephen Gran <sgran@debian.org>, Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>, debian-hppa@lists.debian.org
- Reply-to: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org>, 333766@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 4350310B.5070809@tiscali.be>
- References: <[🔎] 434EDDC2.8010702@aurel32.net> <[🔎] 20051013233344.GA2037@nevyn.them.org> <434EFE74.3060800@tausq.org> <[🔎] 20051014005430.GA4478@nevyn.them.org> <[🔎] 20051014031721.GA3348@colo.lackof.org> <[🔎] 20051014032304.GA7685@nevyn.them.org> <[🔎] 434F2D25.8020901@aurel32.net> <[🔎] 20051014040120.GA8574@nevyn.them.org> <[🔎] 434F316A.4040205@aurel32.net> <[🔎] 4350310B.5070809@tiscali.be>
On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 10:28:27PM +0000, Joel Soete wrote:
>
>
> Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>
> >[...]
>
>
> >Oh yes, BTW, I have seen that glibc does not built anymore on hppa. It
> >seems the new binutils does not accept some assembly instructions.
> >Currently I am doing my tests with binutils 2.16.1. It has to be fixed
> >before uploading a new glibc, but unfortunately I don't speak hppa
> >assembly.
> >
> Is there some build log somewhere (I have a look at
> <http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=hppa&pkg=glibc>) but nothing
> newer then 2.3.5-6 :<?
Don't worry about this - I've already checked in a fix to SVN this
morning.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
Reply to: