> > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2005-March/msg00459.html > > That's not much of a list; I'm not overly concerned. > > > I don't know how Debian handles large issues like this, but this is > > something every package maintainer needs to be aware of quickly. > > If Debian doesn't act soon, they'll be releasing many advisories of this > > type: > > http://www.linuxcompatible.org/story41890.html > > and be getting many complaints from PaX users because their system is > > now unusable. > > Guess what? Debian does not support PaX. Guess what? It does. It also supports exec-shield. chpax - user-space utility to control PaX flags gradm - Administration program for the GrSecurity ACL system gradm2 - Administration program for the grsecurity2 RBAC based ACL system kernel-patch-2.4-grsecurity - grsecurity kernel patch - 2.4.x security patch kernel-patch-grsecurity2 - grsecurity kernel patch - new major upstream version paxctl - user-space utility to control PaX flags - new major upstream version paxtest - Test suite for the PaX kernel patch kernel-patch-adamantix - Kernel patches introduced in Adamantix kernel-patch-exec-shield - Protection against stack smashing and other attacks. Is there someone else that is more concerned with fixing problems than being an asshole that I can talk to about this problem? -Brad
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature