Bug#325600: 325600 (<defunct> threads on Alpha).
Falk Hueffner wrote:
That's weird. What happens with -O0? What with gcc 3.3? Can you
perhaps attach the assembly that is generated for the "broken" case?
This is actually with gcc-3.3 (I started using it by default for these
tests).
Haven't tried "-O0" - will attempt that next.
...tom
"broken" case:
0000000000000f00 <pthread_reap_children>:
f00: 00 00 bb 27 ldah gp,0(t12)
f04: 00 00 bd 23 lda gp,0(gp)
f08: d0 ff de 23 lda sp,-48(sp)
f0c: 01 00 3f 20 lda t0,1
f10: 10 00 5e b5 stq s1,16(sp)
f14: 2a f7 23 48 sll t0,0x1f,s1
f18: 00 00 5e b7 stq ra,0(sp)
f1c: 08 00 3e b5 stq s0,8(sp)
f20: 6d 01 1f 20 lda v0,365
f24: ff ff 1f 22 lda a0,-1
f28: 20 00 3e 22 lda a1,32(sp)
f2c: 01 00 4a 22 lda a2,1(s1)
f30: 13 04 ff 47 clr a3
f34: 83 00 00 00 callsys // return from syscall always 0
(according to strace)
f38: 09 04 e0 47 mov v0,s0
f3c: 10 00 60 f6 bne a3,f80
<pthread_reap_children+0x80>
f40: 01 00 e9 43 sextl s0,t0
f44: 10 04 e1 47 mov t0,a0
f48: 08 00 20 ec ble t0,f6c <pthread_reap_children+0x6c>
f4c: 96 ff 5f d3 bsr ra,da8 <pthread_exited+0x8>
I noticed that the syscall that "wait4" in libc calls is __NR_osf_wait4 (#7)
as opposed to __NR_wait4 (#365) - could that make a difference?
"working" case:
0000000000000f00 <pthread_reap_children>:
f00: 00 00 bb 27 ldah gp,0(t12)
f04: 00 00 bd 23 lda gp,0(gp)
f08: d0 ff de 23 lda sp,-48(sp)
f0c: 01 00 3f 20 lda t0,1
f10: 10 00 5e b5 stq s1,16(sp)
f14: 2a f7 23 48 sll t0,0x1f,s1
f18: 00 00 5e b7 stq ra,0(sp)
f1c: 08 00 3e b5 stq s0,8(sp)
f20: 6d 01 1f 20 lda v0,365
f24: ff ff 1f 22 lda a0,-1
f28: 20 00 3e 22 lda a1,32(sp)
f2c: 01 00 4a 22 lda a2,1(s1)
f30: 13 04 ff 47 clr a3
f34: 83 00 00 00 callsys
f38: 09 04 e0 47 mov v0,s0
f3c: 10 00 60 f6 bne a3,f80 <pthread_reap_children+0x80>
f40: 01 00 e9 43 sextl s0,t0
f44: 10 04 e1 47 mov t0,a0
f48: 08 00 20 ec ble t0,f6c <pthread_reap_children+0x6c>
f4c: 96 ff 5f d3 bsr ra,da8 <pthread_exited+0x8>
Reply to: