Bug#274852: marked as done (/lib/libc.so.6 is not executable)
Your message dated Mon, 23 May 2005 17:42:23 -0400
with message-id <20050523214223.GA13873@nevyn.them.org>
and subject line Fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Oct 2004 11:26:00 +0000
>From f.lovergine@acm.org Mon Oct 04 04:26:00 2004
Return-path: <f.lovergine@acm.org>
Received: from muffin.area.ba.cnr.it [150.145.80.101]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CEQye-0007e7-00; Mon, 04 Oct 2004 04:26:00 -0700
Received: from klecker (klecker.ba.issia.cnr.it [150.145.84.32])
by muffin.area.ba.cnr.it (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id i94BQ22Q016655;
Mon, 4 Oct 2004 13:26:02 +0200
Received: from frankie by klecker with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1CEQyY-0000w1-Nm; Mon, 04 Oct 2004 13:25:54 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Francesco Paolo Lovergine <frankie@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: /lib/libc.so.6 is not executable
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.99.5
Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2004 13:25:54 +0200
Message-Id: <E1CEQyY-0000w1-Nm@klecker>
Sender: Francesco Paolo Lovergine <f.lovergine@acm.org>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-16
Severity: normal
On other distros (e.g. RH) /lib/libc.so.6 is executable and returns
mainly libc version.
This is used in some scripts to check compatibilities and so breaks things.
For instance, it breaks Mathworks' Matlab internal scripts which uses
something like
ver=`/lib/libc.so.6 | head -1 | sed -e "s/^[^0-9]*//" -e "s/[ ,].*$//"`
to extract libc release.
If +x is added to libc.so.6, it fails as follows:
Inconsistency detected by ld.so: rtld.c: 1259: dl_main: \
Assertion `_rtld_local._dl_rtld_map.l_prev->l_next == _rtld_local._dl_rtld_map.l_next' failed!
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-686
Locale: LANG=it_IT@euro, LC_CTYPE=it_IT@euro
Versions of packages libc6 depends on:
ii libdb1-compat 2.1.3-7 The Berkeley database routines [gl
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 276384-done) by bugs.debian.org; 23 May 2005 21:42:26 +0000
>From drow@nevyn.them.org Mon May 23 14:42:26 2005
Return-path: <drow@nevyn.them.org>
Received: from nevyn.them.org [66.93.172.17] (Debian-exim)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DaKgq-0000T3-00; Mon, 23 May 2005 14:42:24 -0700
Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DaKgp-0003c3-4l
for 276384-done@bugs.debian.org; Mon, 23 May 2005 17:42:23 -0400
Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 17:42:23 -0400
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: 276384-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Fixed
Message-ID: <20050523214223.GA13873@nevyn.them.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i
Delivered-To: 276384-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,ONEWORD autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
This bug is now fixed in unstable, and hopefully will be fixed in sarge.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
Reply to: