Bug#219356: marked as done (libc6: i586 optimized libs)
Your message dated Thu, 21 Apr 2005 18:01:23 +0900
with message-id <81sm1k33mk.wl@omega.webmasters.gr.jp>
and subject line Bug#219356: libc6: i586 optimized libs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Nov 2003 22:29:10 +0000
>From efuste@rafale.worldnet.fr Wed Nov 05 16:29:09 2003
Return-path: <efuste@rafale.worldnet.fr>
Received: from aph-aug-104-1-4-173.w80-15.abo.wanadoo.fr (rafale.worldnet.fr) [80.15.18.173]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AHW9F-0002Uy-00; Wed, 05 Nov 2003 16:29:09 -0600
Received: from rafale.worldnet.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by rafale.worldnet.fr (8.12.10/8.12.10/Debian-4) with ESMTP id hA5MT5RG007270;
Wed, 5 Nov 2003 23:29:05 +0100
Received: (from efuste@localhost)
by rafale.worldnet.fr (8.12.10/8.12.10/Debian-4) id hA5MT4hV007268;
Wed, 5 Nov 2003 23:29:04 +0100
Message-Id: <200311052229.hA5MT4hV007268@rafale.worldnet.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Emmanuel Fuste <e.fuste@wanadoo.fr>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: libc6: i586 optimized libs
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.36
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2003 23:29:04 +0100
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.2 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE,MSG_ID_ADDED_BY_MTA_3
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_03
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_03 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-9
Severity: wishlist
Tags: experimental sid
Pleeeeeeaaaaassssse, include an optimized i586 lib package like for i686
in next release. My good hold dual pentium 233mmx computer will be very
very thankful to you.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux rafale 2.4.22 #1 SMP Mon Aug 25 23:20:38 CEST 2003 i586
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages libc6 depends on:
ii libdb1-compat 2.1.3-7 The Berkeley database routines [gl
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 219356-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Apr 2005 09:01:24 +0000
>From gotom@debian.or.jp Thu Apr 21 02:01:24 2005
Return-path: <gotom@debian.or.jp>
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DOXYq-0003hw-00; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 02:01:24 -0700
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CDC4DEB3D
for <219356-done@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 18:01:23 +0900 (JST)
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 18:01:23 +0900
Message-ID: <81sm1k33mk.wl@omega.webmasters.gr.jp>
From: GOTO Masanori <gotom@debian.or.jp>
To: 219356-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#219356: libc6: i586 optimized libs
In-Reply-To: <81n05beat6.wl@omega.webmasters.gr.jp>
References: <81n05beat6.wl@omega.webmasters.gr.jp>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
(i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: 219356-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
> Ah, so the main libc6 packages already have NPTL? I don't need to
> install libc6-i686 to get NPTL? Cool (you should make that more obvious
> in the package description for libc6-i686, that you do not need it for
> NPTL).
> I think there are not much requirement for supporting i586 nowadays.
> Thinking about maintaining costs and compilation time (it's more
> precious than that you guess), at least I don't support it.
This discussion seemed being over, so I close this report. If you
have strong reason to keep opening it, please let us know and reopen
it. The current standard libc6 has already nptl support, so we don't
need libc6-i586.
Regards,
-- gotom
Reply to: