Bug#297769: patch
At Mon, 11 Apr 2005 18:19:57 -0700,
Steve Langasek wrote:
> Given that other packages may in the future begin to depend on this
> interface, I think this should really just be done as a shlibdeps bump.
I investigated this problem, and finally I decided to bump up shlib
vers because (1) it seems it's harmless with my some tests, (2) we
can't anticipate which packages use sched_{set,get}affinity, even if
we have lintian labs (ex: fakeroot does not sched_*).
Regards,
-- gotom
Reply to: