Bug#297769: patch
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 10:04:17PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> At Thu, 7 Apr 2005 23:46:51 -0700,
> David Mosberger wrote:
> > GOTO> I fear to change this interface until sarge release because there
> > GOTO> might be another packages that uses sched_setaffinity.
> >
> > Well, yes, schedutils probably would need updating. I don't know of
> > anything else, though. We only care about the Debian packages for
> > sarge, I assume, right? If so, couldn't someone do a trivial find
> > across all sources for sched_{s,g}et_affinity? I'd be happy to
> > volunteer to fix all the packages that are affected (I'm not too
> > worried, the number will be very small, I'm sure of that).
>
> Yes, fixing this issue is not difficult.
>
> The problem I concerned is the symbol GLIBC_PRIVATE is defined as
> GLIBC_2.3.4, not the current symbol GLIBC_2.3.3. I'm not certain this
> change does not cause any problems.
It does not; Bastian's patch looks fine to me. I do this for glibc
backports on a regular basis.
The only thing that might be affected would be GLIBC_PRIVATE, and
nothing needs to be compatible with GLIBC_PRIVATE outside the glibc
packages. I don't think it will actually affect GLIBC_PRIVATE, either,
but I'd have to play around with it to make sure.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
Reply to: