[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#274852: Bug #274852: But in which upstream version?



El Lunes, 28 de Febrero de 2005 02:23, GOTO Masanori escribió:
> At Wed, 16 Feb 2005 12:36:23 +0100,
>
> David Mart�z Moreno wrote:
> > ender@jane:~$ xmms
> > libmikmod.so.2: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
> > Inconsistency detected by ld.so: ../sysdeps/generic/dl-tls.c: 72:
> > _dl_next_tls_modid: Assertion `result <= _rtld_local._dl_tls_max_dtv_idx'
> > failed!
> >
> >         GOTO, in your last message to this bug you state that the next
> > libc6 release you will include a fix for this, but I have the
> > latest (-20) from Dec and I have this problem.

        Hello, GOTO.

> I'm sorry that my previous statement was in accurate - "the next glibc
> update" means we use the new upstream version - ex: glibc-2.3.4.  So I
> tagged it as "fixed-upstream".

        Oh, *that* glibc update. :-)

> >         Also, the bug says that is fixed upstream. If, as Daniel says in
> > #207872, the patch was rejected upstream, you should remove the tag.
>
> I guess upstream did the another way to fix this issue.  Daniel, did
> you know about it more?

        Yes, please. Because if upstream fixed this, we could backport the 
changes to current glibc, because I do not think that this problem of not 
being able to run certain programs is very desirable for sarge. I will wait 
for Daniel's answer.

        Thank you very much for your reply- Best regards,


                Ender.
-- 
Network engineer
Debian Developer

Attachment: pgpr5n_xtufTY.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: