Bug#233308: Esperanto translations?

[Christian Perrier <bubulle@kheops.frmug.org>]

Quoting Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS (edmund601@rano.org):
> > While I'm at it, something VERY important that slept out in this
> > discussion : the list of supported languages for sarge is
> > *closed*. For size constraints, and for being sure that we don't
> > induce problems with initrd size for D-I RC2 and now RC3, Joey Hess
> > has requested that we stop adding languages to sarge-targeted D-I.
> 
> It would still be nice to have the Esperanto locale in sarge, if that
> can be arranged.

Sure.

gotom and locales/glibc maintainers, any status about this old bug ?

Is it delayed post-sarge, ignored (if so, it should be tagged
"wontfix", imho) or possible to be included in sarge?

There's a chance that a translation begins for Esperanto in Debian
Installer and we at least to have some visibility about the locale
name.

I personnally tend to favour eo_XX. Edmind has suggested eo_AQ
(Antarctica), based on the special status of this territory as part of
mankind's patrimonium. Others (in -esperanto) have suggested eo_EU
which I don't think is appropriate for a universal language...