[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#290772: marked as done (FTBFS on arm: Running ldd on fet binary fails)

Your message dated Wed, 26 Jan 2005 17:09:31 +0200
with message-id <41F7B2AB.5070502@timisoara.roedu.net>
and subject line fet: ftbfs [sparc] ldd: /lib/ld-linux.so.2 exited with unknown exit code (132)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Jan 2005 16:29:16 +0000
>From pre@saruman.uio.no Sun Jan 16 08:29:16 2005
Return-path: <pre@saruman.uio.no>
Received: from pat.uio.no [] (7411)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1CqDH9-0006xV-00; Sun, 16 Jan 2005 08:29:16 -0800
Received: from mail-mx2.uio.no ([])
	by pat.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
	id 1CqDH5-0002Ec-Tm
	for submit@bugs.debian.org; Sun, 16 Jan 2005 17:29:12 +0100
Received: from saruman.uio.no ([])
	by mail-mx2.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
	id 1CqDH2-0006Ae-Pw; Sun, 16 Jan 2005 17:29:08 +0100
Received: from pre by saruman.uio.no with local (Exim 4.30)
	id 1CqDH2-0000yT-D2; Sun, 16 Jan 2005 17:29:08 +0100
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: FTBFS on arm: Running ldd on fet binary fails
From: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com>
Message-Id: <E1CqDH2-0000yT-D2@saruman.uio.no>
Sender: Petter Reinholdtsen <petter.reinholdtsen@usit.uio.no>
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 17:29:08 +0100
X-MailScanner-Information: This message has been scanned for viruses/spam. Contact postmaster@uio.no if you have questions about this scanning
X-UiO-MailScanner: No virus found
X-UiO-Spam-info: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-5, required 12,
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package:  fet
Severity: serious
Version:  3.9.20-1

I noticed on
that the arm build of fet failed.  This is the error message:

  dpkg-shlibdeps: failure: ldd on `debian/fet/usr/bin/fet' gave error
    exit status 1
  dh_shlibdeps: command returned error code 256
  make: *** [binary-arch] Error 1

This looks slightly like some bug with ldd, but thought it was best to
report it to anyway.

Could it be related to the compile warnings reported during the build?
This seem unlikely, but you never know. :)

This problem keep the latest version from propagating into testing:

 - 31 days old (needed 10 days)
 - out of date on arm: fet (from 3.9.19-1)
 - Not considered

Because of this, I set the severity to serious.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.26-1-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Received: (at 290772-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Jan 2005 15:10:00 +0000
>From radu@timisoara.roedu.net Wed Jan 26 07:10:00 2005
Return-path: <radu@timisoara.roedu.net>
Received: from yeti.timisoara.roedu.net [] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1Ctonw-0001uE-00; Wed, 26 Jan 2005 07:10:00 -0800
Received: (qmail 858 invoked by uid 1002); 26 Jan 2005 15:09:26 -0000
Received: from by yeti (envelope-from <radu@timisoara.roedu.net>, uid 64020) with qmail-scanner-1.23st 
 (spamassassin: 3.0.1. perlscan: 1.23st.  
 Processed in 0.039206 secs); 26 Jan 2005 15:09:26 -0000
X-Antivirus-timisoara.roedu.net-Mail-From: radu@timisoara.roedu.net via yeti
X-Antivirus-timisoara.roedu.net: 1.23st (Clear:RC:1( Processed in 0.039206 secs Process 852)
Received: from unknown (HELO ? (radu@
  by 0 with (RC4-MD5 encrypted) SMTP; 26 Jan 2005 15:09:26 -0000
Message-ID: <41F7B2AB.5070502@timisoara.roedu.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 17:09:31 +0200
From: Radu Spineanu <radu@timisoara.roedu.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (X11/20041124)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: GOTO Masanori <gotom@debian.or.jp>
CC: Blars Blarson <blarson@blars.org>,  290772-done@bugs.debian.org, 
 Jurij Smakov <jurij@wooyd.org>
Subject: Re: fet: ftbfs [sparc] ldd: /lib/ld-linux.so.2 exited with unknown
 exit code (132)
References: <[🔎] 817jm0p89m.wl@omega.webmasters.gr.jp>
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 817jm0p89m.wl@omega.webmasters.gr.jp>
X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: 290772-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 

GOTO Masanori wrote:
> BTW, I also send this message to #290772.  Radu, please read comments
> in #268450 from Jurij about sparc fet breakage.  I think some buildd
> for arm uses old kernel, so this problem is occured.  I built fet
> package on arm box which is (IIRC) 2.4.27 kernel.  I guess the recent
> kernel has no problem and #290772 can be closed.

Thanks to all for investigating this, i am closing the bug report.
Will the arm buildd update kernels ?


Reply to: