Bug#265245: marked as done (glibc-doc: htonl/ntohl belong in arpa/inet.h)
Your message dated Fri, 14 Jan 2005 10:53:43 +0900
with message-id <81sm54rd20.wl@omega.webmasters.gr.jp>
and subject line Bug#265245: glibc-doc: htonl/ntohl belong in arpa/inet.h
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Aug 2004 11:08:46 +0000
>From herbert@gondor.apana.org.au Thu Aug 12 04:08:46 2004
Return-path: <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Received: from arnor.apana.org.au [203.14.152.115] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BvDRt-0007ih-00; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 04:08:46 -0700
Received: from gondolin.me.apana.org.au ([192.168.0.6] ident=mail)
by arnor.apana.org.au with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1BvDRr-0000Ay-00
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 21:08:43 +1000
Received: from herbert by gondolin.me.apana.org.au with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1BvDRq-0000oc-00
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 21:08:42 +1000
From: <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Subject: glibc-doc: htonl/ntohl belong in arpa/inet.h
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10.2
Message-Id: <E1BvDRq-0000oc-00@gondolin.me.apana.org.au>
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 21:08:42 +1000
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: glibc-doc
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-13
Severity: normal
According to POSIX, htonl/ntohl are declared in arpa/inet.h. So
the info text should be modified to refer to that file instead of
netinet/in.h.
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Kernel Version: Linux gondolin 2.4.26-1-686-smp #1 SMP Sat May 1 19:17:11 EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 265245-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jan 2005 01:53:44 +0000
>From gotom@debian.or.jp Thu Jan 13 17:53:44 2005
Return-path: <gotom@debian.or.jp>
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CpGel-0002XU-00; Thu, 13 Jan 2005 17:53:44 -0800
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 4B0FBDEB4B; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 10:53:43 +0900 (JST)
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 10:53:43 +0900
Message-ID: <81sm54rd20.wl@omega.webmasters.gr.jp>
From: GOTO Masanori <gotom@debian.or.jp>
To: <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>, 265245-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#265245: glibc-doc: htonl/ntohl belong in arpa/inet.h
In-Reply-To: <E1BvDRq-0000oc-00@gondolin.me.apana.org.au>
References: <E1BvDRq-0000oc-00@gondolin.me.apana.org.au>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
(i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: 265245-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
At Thu, 12 Aug 2004 21:08:42 +1000,
<herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> wrote:
> According to POSIX, htonl/ntohl are declared in arpa/inet.h. So
> the info text should be modified to refer to that file instead of
> netinet/in.h.
Exactly POSIX says it should be arpa/inet.h. However glibc put such
definitions in netinet/in.h. But don't worry because arpa/inet.h
always includes netinet/in.h, so we don't violate POSIX definition. I
close this report.
Regards,
-- gotom
Reply to: