Re: Bug#253030: libc6.1 2.3.2.ds1-13 ia64 is broken
severity 253030 important
thanks
I fixed this problem with binary NMU 2.3.2.ds1-13.0.1_ia64. However,
according to Jeff, this bug may be still appeared. I downgrade it to
important. Note that, unfortunatelly, I built NMU stuff on
merulo.debian.org, but it was not appeared.
At Tue, 8 Jun 2004 07:58:01 -0600,
LaMont Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 10:00:41PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> > So this $(libc) is incorrectly set as "libc6", not "libc6.1".
> >
> > We only know that the package Depends field is not correct; Lamont, do
> > you have build log or the environment to reappear this problem?
> > Apparenly this behavior is out of our intension.
>
> I have the build log. Note that in the source package, when I 'ls -t debian'
> control appears before control.in.
>
> Full build log at:
> http://people.debian.org/~lamont/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-13_20040529-2327
>
> % grep debian/control logs/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-13_20040529-2327
> - debian/control.in/main: Change to new email address.
> - debian/control: Update.
> - debian/control.in/libc: libc-udeb depends on libnss-dns-udeb and
> - debian/control.in/libnss-dns-udeb: Update description.
> If that speeds things up at all...
Thanks, but I could not find what the actual problem is...
Regards,
-- gotom
Reply to: