[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#248373: marked as done (libc6.1: 2.3.2.ds1-12 on Alpha takes much more disk space than 2.3.2.ds1-11)



Your message dated Sun, 06 Jun 2004 04:45:38 +0900
with message-id <81y8n1vlel.wl@omega.webmasters.gr.jp>
and subject line Bug#248373: libc6.1: 2.3.2.ds1-12 on Alpha takes much more disk space than 2.3.2.ds1-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 May 2004 20:21:02 +0000
>From pahartik@zazu.vip.fi Mon May 10 13:21:02 2004
Return-path: <pahartik@zazu.vip.fi>
Received: from fep19.inet.fi [194.251.242.244] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BNHGn-0001Ww-00; Mon, 10 May 2004 13:21:01 -0700
Received: from zazu.vip.fi ([80.223.232.180]) by fep19.inet.fi with ESMTP
          id <20040510202059.CBXM11936.fep19.inet.fi@zazu.vip.fi>;
          Mon, 10 May 2004 23:20:59 +0300
Received: from mufasa.vip.fi ([192.168.1.4])
	by zazu.vip.fi with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 1BNHGk-0002XP-00; Mon, 10 May 2004 23:20:58 +0300
Received: from pahartik by mufasa.vip.fi with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 1BNHGg-0001Vu-00; Mon, 10 May 2004 23:20:54 +0300
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Paavo Hartikainen <pahartik@sci.fi>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: libc6.1: 2.3.2.ds1-12 on Alpha takes much more disk space than 2.3.2.ds1-11
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.58
Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 23:20:51 +0300
Message-Id: <E1BNHGg-0001Vu-00@mufasa.vip.fi>
Sender: <pahartik@mufasa>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1

Package: libc6.1
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-11
Severity: normal

Changelog does not explain why previous version was 15 MB and current 
version is 50 MB.  Is it "not stripped" for some reason?

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: alpha
Kernel: Linux 2.6.4
Locale: LANG=fi_FI@euro, LC_CTYPE=fi_FI@euro

Versions of packages libc6.1 depends on:
ii  libdb1-compat                 2.1.3-7    The Berkeley database routines [gl

-- no debconf information

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 248373-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Jun 2004 19:45:39 +0000
>From gotom@debian.or.jp Sat Jun 05 12:45:39 2004
Return-path: <gotom@debian.or.jp>
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BWh6p-0006NG-00; Sat, 05 Jun 2004 12:45:39 -0700
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 747FEDEB58; Sun,  6 Jun 2004 04:45:38 +0900 (JST)
Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2004 04:45:38 +0900
Message-ID: <81y8n1vlel.wl@omega.webmasters.gr.jp>
From: GOTO Masanori <gotom@debian.or.jp>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org>
Cc: GOTO Masanori <gotom@debian.or.jp>,
	Paavo Hartikainen <pahartik@sci.fi>, 248373-done@bugs.debian.org,
	234021@bugs.debian.org, Jeff Bailey <jbailey@raspberryginger.com>,
	James Troup <james@nocrew.org>
Subject: Re: Bug#248373: libc6.1: 2.3.2.ds1-12 on Alpha takes much more disk space than 2.3.2.ds1-11
In-Reply-To: <20040518151840.GA25230@nevyn.them.org>
References: <E1BNHGg-0001Vu-00@mufasa.vip.fi>
	<20040510204851.GB32347@marge.v3.ca>
	<87hdumfvx7.fsf@sci.fi>
	<81wu3i6yhm.wl@omega.webmasters.gr.jp>
	<20040512133805.GC25196@nevyn.them.org>
	<81wu3hznch.wl@omega.webmasters.gr.jp>
	<20040518151840.GA25230@nevyn.them.org>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
 FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: 248373-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2

At Tue, 18 May 2004 11:18:40 -0400,
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > James, could you look at to apply this patch for alpha?  We need this
> > patch for libc6.1 on alpha (and maybe arm).
> 
> I think this is a good idea.  I asked Alan Modra about it again and he
> said he hadn't had time to look at it; if we wait for it to be applied
> to HEAD it may be a very long wait.

This bug is fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-13, which should be compiled with
the fixed-binutils on alpha.  I close this bug.

Regards,
-- gotom



Reply to: