Bug#231538: *sigh*
GOTO Masanori wrote:
> At Sat, 20 Mar 2004 13:56:31 -0500,
> Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> > Kernel 2.4.24 is *not* present in woody.
> > It is in woody-proposed-updates.
> >
> > Please, someone, remember to convince Martin Schulze to accept it. :-)
>
> I don't know pure "woody" can have new kernel 2.4.24 package. Martin,
> and Herbert?
Why should it? The most recent Kernel in woody is 2.4.19. There
won't be any newer ones than the ones with which woody was released.
> If "woody" does not have new kernel 2.4.24 package, then real i386
It doesn't.
> processor machine is hard to install newer glibc on sid because
> the latest glibc depends on kernel 2.4.24 or later.
What does sid have to do with woody?
> So if "woody" can't have 2.4.24, then should we add message to display
> "you need to install kernel 2.4.24 (it's available on the
> woody-proposed-updates)" with libc6.preinst?
You can't depend on the package stay in proposed-updates forever.
Regards,
Joey
--
No question is too silly to ask, but, of course, some are too silly
to answer. -- Perl book
Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.
Reply to: