At Mon, 23 Feb 2004 08:29:46 -0500, Jeff Bailey wrote: > On Mon, 2004-02-23 at 08:09, Wichert Akkerman wrote: > > Previously Jeff Bailey wrote: > > > Thanks for the report - it's our problem, since kerberos has been > > > recompiled since and no longer provides this header. We need to > > > conflict. > > > > Wouldn't a replace be a lot more convenient? > > Yes, that's right. =) Is this already fixed? How to fix it? Regards, -- gotom