Re: linking against an older glibc?
On Fri, Dec 10, 2004 at 10:04:24AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> That would be libc-alpha. But it's not a very helpful list.
Daniel, thanks for the response and the information.
Whoops, I thought libc-alpha was for DEC Alpha systems.
> Use -B$prefix/lib/ instead. You may also want -rpath-link $prefix/lib
> (which only affects the static linker search path, unlike -rpath).
This is exactly what I was looking for. With "-B$prefix/lib
-Wl,-rpath-link,$prefix/lib" it worked great. Thank you.
> You should not need to do either of those. The segfault is presumably
> because you misused -nostdlib (it takes away more than crt1.o!)
Indeed, I did not need to use these. Thank you for your expertise, it has