[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#283705: marked as done (libc6-dev recommends c-compiler with no concrete alternative)



Your message dated Tue, 07 Dec 2004 21:16:45 +0900
with message-id <81u0qyuwuq.wl@omega.webmasters.gr.jp>
and subject line libc6-dev recommends c-compiler with no concrete alternative
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Nov 2004 15:35:14 +0000
>From geof@hellea.be Tue Nov 30 07:35:06 2004
Return-path: <geof@hellea.be>
Received: from mirapoint5.brutele.be [212.68.203.254] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1CZA1x-0006Ps-00; Tue, 30 Nov 2004 07:35:05 -0800
Received: from [192.168.217.21] ([212.68.212.242])
	by mirapoint5.brutele.be (MOS 3.4.7-GR)
	with ESMTP id BGK04970;
	Tue, 30 Nov 2004 16:34:20 +0100 (CET)
Message-Id: <200411301534.BGK04970@mirapoint5.brutele.be>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: geof <geof@hellea.be>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: aptitude: installs libc5 with kernel-source-2.6.8
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.2
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 16:32:45 +0100
X-Junkmail-Status: score=0/50, host=mirapoint5.brutele.be
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: aptitude
Version: 0.2.15.8-1
Severity: important

1) aptitude doesn't install the same packages as apt.
2) aptitude want to install libc5 upon kernel-source-2.6.8
installation.  I can't find any dependency on libc5 in the kernel-source
package.

WITH APTITUDE
-------------

Building Dependency Tree...
Reading extended state information
Initializing package states...
Reading task descriptions...
The following NEW packages will be automatically installed:
  altgcc bzip2 ldso libc5 libc5-altdev 
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  altgcc binutils bzip2 gcc gcc-3.3 kernel-source-2.6.8 ldso libc5 
  libc5-altdev libc6-dev linux-kernel-headers make 
0 packages upgraded, 12 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 45.8MB of archives. After unpacking 72.1MB will be used.

WITH APT-GET
------------

Reading Package Lists...
Building Dependency Tree...
The following extra packages will be installed:
  binutils bzip2
Suggested packages:
  binutils-doc libncurses-dev kernel-package libqt3-mt-dev
Recommended packages:
  libc6-dev libc-dev gcc make
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  binutils bzip2 kernel-source-2.6.8
0 upgraded, 3 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 37.3MB of archives.
After unpacking 41.5MB of additional disk space will be used.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages aptitude depends on:
ii  apt [libapt-pkg-libc6.3-5-3 0.5.27       Advanced front-end for dpkg
ii  libc6                       2.3.2.ds1-18 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgcc1                     1:3.4.2-2    GCC support library
ii  libncurses5                 5.4-4        Shared libraries for terminal hand
ii  libsigc++-1.2-5c102         1.2.5-1      Type-safe Signal Framework for C++
ii  libstdc++5                  1:3.3.4-13   The GNU Standard C++ Library v3

-- no debconf information

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 283705-done) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Dec 2004 12:16:47 +0000
>From gotom@debian.or.jp Tue Dec 07 04:16:47 2004
Return-path: <gotom@debian.or.jp>
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1CbeGt-0001o6-00; Tue, 07 Dec 2004 04:16:47 -0800
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id A346EDEB58
	for <283705-done@bugs.debian.org>; Tue,  7 Dec 2004 21:16:45 +0900 (JST)
Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 21:16:45 +0900
Message-ID: <81u0qyuwuq.wl@omega.webmasters.gr.jp>
From: GOTO Masanori <gotom@debian.or.jp>
To: 283705-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: libc6-dev recommends c-compiler with no concrete alternative
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
 FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: 283705-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

It's the same with #283668.  Closed.



Reply to: