Bug#268078: the architecture name

To: Rafael Ávila de Espíndola <rafael.espindola@gmail.com>, 268078@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#268078: the architecture name
From: GOTO Masanori <gotom@debian.or.jp>
Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2004 23:20:43 +0900
Message-id: <[🔎] 81llcervpg.wl@omega.webmasters.gr.jp>
Reply-to: GOTO Masanori <gotom@debian.or.jp>, 268078@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 200412031026.16333.rafael.espindola@gmail.com>
References: <[🔎] 200412031026.16333.rafael.espindola@gmail.com>

At Fri, 3 Dec 2004 10:26:16 -0200,
Rafael �ila de Esp�ola wrote:
> Andreas Jochens pointed out that ppc64 is a better name for the architecture 
> since LSB uses it. Please use the attached patch with the new architecture 
> name.

We don't support ppc64 yet.  Is this bug wishlist for supporting ppc64?

Regards,
-- gotom

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Bug#268078: the architecture name
  - From: Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espindola@gmail.com>

References:
- Bug#268078: the architecture name
  - From: Rafael Ávila de Espíndola <rafael.espindola@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Bug#284137: locale -a reports misleading values for UTF-8 locales
Next by Date: Bug#259302: Patch update against base-files 3.1
Previous by thread: Bug#268078: the architecture name
Next by thread: Bug#268078: the architecture name
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread