Bug#170861: marked as done (libc6: famd stopped working / SIGRTMIN problem)
Your message dated Thu, 21 Oct 2004 11:13:08 +0900
with message-id <81mzygyg23.wl@omega.webmasters.gr.jp>
and subject line Bug#170861: libc6: famd stopped working / SIGRTMIN problem
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Nov 2002 23:43:20 +0000
>From ad@papyrus-gmbh.de Tue Nov 26 17:43:20 2002
Return-path: <ad@papyrus-gmbh.de>
Received: from (papyrus-gmbh.de) [212.105.204.1] (frigi)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18GpMN-0002BF-00; Tue, 26 Nov 2002 17:43:19 -0600
Received: from pluto.noname ([192.168.77.10] ident=mail)
by papyrus-gmbh.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 18GpMH-0000pN-00; Wed, 27 Nov 2002 00:43:13 +0100
Received: from ad by pluto.noname with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 18GpMH-0001G8-00; Wed, 27 Nov 2002 00:43:13 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Andreas Degert <ad@papyrus-gmbh.de>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: libc6: famd stopped working / SIGRTMIN problem
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.9
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 00:43:13 +0100
Message-Id: <E18GpMH-0001G8-00@pluto.noname>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0
tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.1-5
Severity: important
When compiling fam with this version of libc, no rt-signal
will be sent when the contents of a monitored directory changes.
fcntl(fd, F_SETSIG, SIGRTMIN) sets the signal to 32. All kernel
calls as shown by strace seem to be ok, but no signal is delivered
afterwards (not even SIGIO instead of a rt-signal). If the signal
number is changed to SIGRTMIN+1 or higher, everthing works.
Installed kernel package is kernel-image-2.4.19-686-smp.
This is rather mysterious, but reproducable on my system.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux pluto 2.4.19-686-smp #1 SMP Sun Oct 6 19:14:41 EST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=de_DE, LC_CTYPE=de_DE
Versions of packages libc6 depends on:
ii libdb1-compat 2.1.3-4 The Berkeley database routines [gl
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 170861-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Oct 2004 02:13:10 +0000
>From gotom@debian.or.jp Wed Oct 20 19:13:09 2004
Return-path: <gotom@debian.or.jp>
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CKSRx-0000I4-00; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 19:13:09 -0700
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4517DECC8
for <170861-done@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 11:13:08 +0900 (JST)
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 11:13:08 +0900
Message-ID: <81mzygyg23.wl@omega.webmasters.gr.jp>
From: GOTO Masanori <gotom@debian.or.jp>
To: 170861-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#170861: libc6: famd stopped working / SIGRTMIN problem
In-Reply-To: <81n02hizmn.wl@omega.webmasters.gr.jp>
References: <E18GpMH-0001G8-00@pluto.noname>
<81n02hizmn.wl@omega.webmasters.gr.jp>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
(i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: 170861-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
At Sat, 03 Jul 2004 11:38:24 +0900,
GOTO Masanori wrote:
> Andreas, could you confirm this bug is still appeared in the latest
> glibc 2.3.2.ds1-13 with the appropriate kernel? I agree with Philip's
> opinion; it's kernel problem rathar than glibc. If you have no
> objection, I'll close this bug. If you think there's problem in fam,
> I welcome to see your simple test program.
There's no more reports about this bug. I think it's not glibc bug,
or it's already fixed. I close this bug.
Regards,
-- gotom
Reply to: