Bug#201650: marked as done (libc6.1: Missing libdb.so.2.1)
Your message dated Thu, 21 Oct 2004 10:58:25 +0900
with message-id <81u0soygqm.wl@omega.webmasters.gr.jp>
and subject line Bug#201650: libc6.1: Missing libdb.so.2.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jul 2003 00:38:19 +0000
>From webb@robust.colorado.edu Wed Jul 16 19:38:15 2003
Return-path: <webb@robust.colorado.edu>
Received: from robust.colorado.edu (riccati) [128.138.120.47]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19cwmk-0003eh-00; Wed, 16 Jul 2003 19:38:14 -0500
Received: from webb by riccati with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 19cwmq-000313-00; Wed, 16 Jul 2003 18:38:20 -0600
From: Daniel Webb <webb@robust.colorado.edu>
Subject: libc6.1: Missing libdb.so.2.1
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10.1
Message-Id: <E19cwmq-000313-00@riccati>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 18:38:20 -0600
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: libc6.1
Version: 2.2.5-11.5
Severity: normal
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Kernel Version: Linux riccati 2.4.20 #1 Wed Apr 2 22:28:21 MST 2003 alpha unknown
Everything worked fine until an apt-get upgrade last night.
>/etc/init.d/apache start
Starting web server: apache/usr/sbin/apache: error while loading shared libraries:
libdb.so.2.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
failed
(I have stable, testing, and unstable in my sources.list, but run almost exclusively
stable)
>auto-apt update
<...>
>auto-apt search libdb.so.2.1
lib/libdb.so.2.1 base/libc6.1,oldlibs/libdb1-compat
libdb1-compat is only in testing and unstable, so I assume libc6.1 should have the file
on my system.
>dpkg --status libc6.1
Package: libc6.1
Status: install ok installed
Priority: required
Section: base
Installed-Size: 17780
Maintainer: Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org>
Source: glibc
Version: 2.2.5-11.5
Replaces: ldso (<= 1.9.11-9), timezone, timezones, gconv-modules, libtricks, libc6.1-bin,
netkit-rpc, netbase (<< 4.0)
Provides: glibc-2.2.5-11.5
Suggests: locales, glibc-doc
Conflicts: strace (<< 4.0-0), libnss-db (<< 2.2-3), timezone, timezones, gconv-modules,
libtricks, libc6.1-doc, libc6.1-bin, libwcsmbs, apt (<< 0.3.0), libglib1.2 (<< 1.2.1-2),
libc6-i586, libc6-i686, libc6-v9, netkit-rpc
Conffiles:
/etc/default/devpts fc857c5ac5fb84d80720ed4d1c624f6e
Description: GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone data
Contains the standard libraries that are used by nearly all programs on
the system. This package includes shared versions of the standard C library
and the standard math library, as well as many others.
Timezone data is also included.
Fix:
>ln -s libdb.so.3 libdb.so.2.1
>/etc/init.d/apache start
Starting web server: apache[Wed Jul 16 18:37:04 2003] [alert] apache: Could not determine
the server's fully qualified domain name, using 127.0.0.1 for ServerName
.
Previous to all this, I tried
>dpkg-reconfigure libc6.1
and it had no errors, but did not help.
Daniel
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 201650-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Oct 2004 01:58:26 +0000
>From gotom@debian.or.jp Wed Oct 20 18:58:26 2004
Return-path: <gotom@debian.or.jp>
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CKSDi-0007zb-00; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 18:58:26 -0700
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9737DDECC8
for <201650-done@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 10:58:25 +0900 (JST)
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 10:58:25 +0900
Message-ID: <81u0soygqm.wl@omega.webmasters.gr.jp>
From: GOTO Masanori <gotom@debian.or.jp>
To: 201650-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#201650: libc6.1: Missing libdb.so.2.1
In-Reply-To: <81smcaiolu.wl@omega.webmasters.gr.jp>
References: <E19cwmq-000313-00@riccati>
<81smcaiolu.wl@omega.webmasters.gr.jp>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
(i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: 201650-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
At Fri, 02 Jul 2004 21:24:13 +0900,
GOTO Masanori wrote:
> I checked alpha woody:
>
> escher:~> dpkg -s libc6.1 | grep Version:
> Version: 2.2.5-11.5
> escher:~> uname -m
> alpha
> escher:~> dpkg -L libc6.1 | grep libdb
> /lib/libdb1-2.2.5.so
> /lib/libdb.so.2.1
> /lib/libdb1.so.2.1
> escher:~> ls -al /lib/libdb*
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 Sep 21 2003 /lib/libdb.so.2.1 -> libdb1-2.2.5.so
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 401424 Apr 18 2002 /lib/libdb.so.3
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 156697 Apr 3 2003 /lib/libdb1-2.2.5.so
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 Sep 21 2003 /lib/libdb1.so.2.1 -> libdb1-2.2.5.so
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 Sep 21 2003 /lib/libdb2.so.2 -> libdb2.so.2.7.7
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 451024 Apr 18 2002 /lib/libdb2.so.2.7.7
>
> So I think there's no problem. Do you still have this problem?
> If you have no objection, I'll close this bug.
I think it should be fixed. I close this bug. If you still have
problem, please reopen this bug and send us more information.
Regards,
-- gotom
Reply to: