Bug#276062: Severity downgraded to wishlist : I still did not get any reason why linuxthread is used in static mode

To: eric.valette@free.fr, 276062@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#276062: Severity downgraded to wishlist : I still did not get any reason why linuxthread is used in static mode
From: GOTO Masanori <gotom@debian.or.jp>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 18:39:58 +0900
Message-id: <[🔎] 81y8ictgup.wl@omega.webmasters.gr.jp>
Reply-to: GOTO Masanori <gotom@debian.or.jp>, 276062@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 416B8AC3.9080106@free.fr>
References: <[🔎] 416B8AC3.9080106@free.fr>

At Tue, 12 Oct 2004 09:41:55 +0200,
Eric Valette wrote:
> I don't mind you change the severity but would like to get an explanation...

I think it's good idea to support /usr/lib/nptl - but it's wishlist
rathar than important.  We plan to support them after sarge (because
we're base freeze period).

Regards,
-- gotom

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Bug#276062: Severity downgraded to wishlist : I still did not get any reason why linuxthread is used in static mode
  - From: Eric Valette <eric.valette@free.fr>

References:
- Bug#276062: Severity downgraded to wishlist : I still did not get any reason why linuxthread is used in static mode
  - From: Eric Valette <eric.valette@free.fr>

Prev by Date: Bug#276138: sys/un.h: SUN_LEN cannot be used in abstract namespace
Next by Date: Bug#276138: marked as done (sys/un.h: SUN_LEN cannot be used in abstract namespace)
Previous by thread: Bug#276062: Severity downgraded to wishlist : I still did not get any reason why linuxthread is used in static mode
Next by thread: Bug#276062: Severity downgraded to wishlist : I still did not get any reason why linuxthread is used in static mode
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread