[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#271428: Processed: your mail



On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 11:26:36AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
Oh, whatever. I am not going to search whether this is specified in
the standards. I am talking about common sense here. A line such as
 Tue Sep 14 06:19:23 Croatia/Split 2004

is just plain wrong. Either date should report an error when the
requested timezone cannot be found, or it should specify which
timezone is at the basis of the date and time it reports.

No, not date. date has nothing to do with this, it's a libc function
(which is why it's reassigned to libc). I fully agree that *libc* should
handle the case differently, it's been confusing users for years. If
people really want to use oddball timezones there is a simple procedure
for adding a new zoneinfo file.

Mike Stone



Reply to: