Bug#265486: NPTL-related
severity 265486 normal
tags 265486 moreinfo
thanks
At 13 Aug 2004 13:25:17 -0000,
Simon Rumble wrote:
> Ack!  Turns out it's a UML thing to do with NPTL.  I apologise for
> the hysteria, but it kinda seemed rather broken 8)
> 
> Perhaps we could implement some kind of check for a UML kernel, at
> least while they don't support NPTL/TLS?
At least we have not heard about UML problem with the 2.6 kernel.  The
current user-mode-linux 2.4 kernel and uml\* packages in debian works
well.  The recent modification for glibc from -13 to -16 is not so
large.  
Please investigate more and report us the detailed information.  If
you don't have spare time to check it, and you have no objection,
we'll close it.
Regards,
-- gotom
Reply to: