On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 04:28:56PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 07:05:35PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > > I don't understand why you think it's bad idea. Until glibc included > > mqueue, it was existed as separated library. AFAIK, there is no > > application that use mqueue library in main. This means user links > > mqueue library with his application with his hand. > > glibc got mqueue support when the kernel got it. SLES9 and RHEL4 will > have it so applications will start to use it. But given glibc on sarge > is totally outdated anyway there will probably be little chance to run > recent 3rd-party binaries on sarge anyway. I can't remember a time when 3rd party binaries ran properly on Debian. That's what LSB is for. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature